Mobility and the Role of Education as a Commitment Device
22 Pages Posted: 30 May 2001
Date Written: April 2001
Abstract
European integration forces system competition within European countries. This competition has important implications for both the public pay-as-you-go pension scheme and the public education system. Without labor mobility, each generation has an incentive to invest in the human capital of the subsequent generation in order to maximize pension payments. It is a popular belief that increasing labor mobility decreases the incentives to finance the education of the subsequent generation. This paper shows that this is not true if human capital investment increases the mobility of the subsequent generation and can thus be used as a commitment device for low taxes.
Keywords: Education, Intergenerational Transfers, Commitment
JEL Classification: H52, H55
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Human Capital Investment and Globalization in Extortionary States
By Fredrik Andersson and Kai A. Konrad
-
Globalization and Human Capital Formation
By Fredrik Andersson and Kai A. Konrad
-
Factor Mobility and Fiscal Policy in the EU: Policy Issues and Analytical Approaches
-
Education, Redistribution, and the Threat of Brain Drain
By Alexander Haupt and Eckhard Janeba
-
Privacy, Time Consistent Optimal Labor Income Taxation and Education Policy
-
Public Education in an Integrated Europe: Studying to Migrate and Teaching to Stay?
-
An Economic Rationale for Public Education: The Value of Commitment
-
Educational Federalism and the Quality Effects of Tuition Fees