LSE Law Department Briefings on the Investigatory Powers Bill - Comparing Surveillance Powers: UK, US and France

4 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2015

See all articles by A.D. Murray

A.D. Murray

London School of Economics - Law Department

Date Written: December 15, 2015

Abstract

Both France and the US operate an extensive signals intelligence network, not unlike the UK’s, and both have experienced recent terrorist activity and remain likely targets for terrorist activity in the future, like the UK. At the same time, the US and France have a divergent approach to the legal framework for surveillance powers. The US is taking steps to reduce the legal authority of Federal bodies, including national security bodies, to intercept and retain communications data and content. France, on the other hand, has recently substantially extended authorisation and powers for interception and retention of data. In institutional terms, the United States operates a judicial authorisation process while France operates a political authorisation process, which is not unlike the double lock process proposed in the Investigatory Powers Bill.

Keywords: IP Bill, investigatory powers, surveillance, terrorism, Freedom Act, CNCTR

Suggested Citation

Murray, Andrew D., LSE Law Department Briefings on the Investigatory Powers Bill - Comparing Surveillance Powers: UK, US and France (December 15, 2015). LSE Law - Policy Briefing Paper No. 2703852. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2703852 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2703852

Andrew D. Murray (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law Department ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom
020 7849 4645 (Phone)
020 7955 7366 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.itlaw.org.uk/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
410
Abstract Views
1,752
rank
72,457
PlumX Metrics