Instrumentation Strategies and Instrument Mixes for Long Term Climate Policy

176 Pages Posted: 22 Dec 2015

See all articles by Gjalt Huppes

Gjalt Huppes

CML-IE

Sebastiaan Deetman

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology

Ruben Huele

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology

René Kleijn

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology

Arjun de Koning

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology

Ester van der Voet

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology

Date Written: October 28, 2015

Abstract

The good intentions of COP21 are to be reached by novel climate policy instrumentation, beyond what has been developed till now. For the long term two fundamentally different strategies emerge, each leading to a set of instruments fit for the challenging task in principle. The first has a command and control orientation, developing and specifying the technologies required and bringing them in the market. Prime instruments are subsidies like feed-in tariffs and capital subsidies and standards and regulations, as to force coal fired power stations out of the market and efficient cars into the market. These technology specific instruments override the current strict EU cap-and-trade system. This governance orientation is on optimization from a broad and integrative perspective, including distributional issues, energy policy and transport policy. The second strategy has its focus on incentive creation and option creation, transforming and strengthening EU ETS into a price stabilized emission pricing system, ultimately as an emission tax. A core institutional element is the creation of a European open real time electricity market, with equal but quite variable prices for all primary and secondary producers and for all users. Two sets of instruments are substantially mutually exclusive; feed-in tariffs and user differentiated surcharges to fund them are not compatible with open electricity markets. The two sets of instruments are substantially mutually exclusive; for example feed-in tariffs and user differentiated surcharges to fund them are not compatible with open electricity markets and not compatible with pure cap-and-trade systems. Discussion and choices are due.

Keywords: Climate policy instrumentation, Instrumentation strategies, emission pricing, emission tax, climate governance, institutionalism, innovation incentives

JEL Classification: H21, H23

Suggested Citation

Huppes, Gjalt and Deetman, Sebastiaan and Huele, Ruben and Kleijn, René and de Koning, Arjun and van der Voet, Ester, Instrumentation Strategies and Instrument Mixes for Long Term Climate Policy (October 28, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2706117 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2706117

Gjalt Huppes (Contact Author)

CML-IE ( email )

PO Box 9518
Leiden, ZH NL-1012DE
Netherlands

Sebastiaan Deetman

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology ( email )

PO Box 9518
Leiden, ZH NL-1012DE
Netherlands

Ruben Huele

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology ( email )

PO Box 9518
Leiden, ZH NL-1012DE
Netherlands

René Kleijn

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology

PO Box 9518
Leiden, ZH NL-1012DE
Netherlands

Arjun De Koning

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology ( email )

PO Box 9518
Leiden, ZH NL-1012DE
Netherlands

Ester Van der Voet

Leiden University - CML, Department Industrial Ecology

PO Box 9518
Leiden, ZH NL-1012DE
Netherlands

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
48
Abstract Views
348
PlumX Metrics