Participation in Alternative Retail Channels: A Choice or Necessity?

International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 235-243.

9 Pages Posted: 26 Dec 2015

See all articles by Colin Williams

Colin Williams

University of Sheffield - School of Management

Date Written: 2003

Abstract

The view that alternative retail channels (i.e., informal and/or second-hand modes of goods acquisition) are used out of economic necessity by disadvantaged consumers has been recently opposed by cultural theorists who instead read such channels in agency-orientated terms as places of fun, sociality, distinction, discernment, the spectacular and so forth. To evaluate these contrasting perspectives, this paper reports data from 350 interviews conducted in rural England. Finding that the agency-orientated view of alternative retail channels is valid amongst higher-income populations but economic necessity remains the principal motive amongst lower-income populations, this paper concludes that for a fuller understanding to be achieved, the dualistic either/or debates between those promulgating economic necessity and those emphasising choice need to be replaced by a both/and approach sensitive to the variations in the meanings of such channels.

Keywords: Informal sector, household work practices, livelihoods, economic development, England

JEL Classification: H26, J46, J48, K34, K42, O17

Suggested Citation

Williams, Colin, Participation in Alternative Retail Channels: A Choice or Necessity? (2003). International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 235-243., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2708046

Colin Williams (Contact Author)

University of Sheffield - School of Management ( email )

15 Conduit Road
Sheffield, S10 1FL
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/management/staff/williams/index

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
8
Abstract Views
192
PlumX Metrics