Developing Democracy Through Citizen Engagement: The Advent of Popular Participation in the United Kingdom's Constitution-Making

Also published in (2015) Vol 4 Issue 2 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law

Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2015/39

19 Pages Posted: 28 Dec 2015

See all articles by Silvia Suteu

Silvia Suteu

University College London - Faculty of Laws

Date Written: December 27, 2015

Abstract

This paper looks at citizen assembly-style constitutional conventions as a path towards revitalising representative democratic institutions. Such conventions were notoriously set up in British Columbia, The Netherlands, Ontario, Iceland and Ireland; the Scottish Government promised one for an independent Scotland, and calls for a United Kingdom-wide convention remain strong following the Scottish referendum. The assumption behind such calls has been that direct citizen engagement in constitutional revision processes will supplement or even replace traditional political institutions and thereby invigorate democracy. Involving the people in constitution-drafting, the argument goes, actualises the hitherto mythical ‘people’ and turns self-government into an empirical reality.

This paper seeks to test this assumption. While acknowledging the numerous potential benefits of citizen assemblies in constitution-making, it is suggested that more thought is necessary before advocating them as a one-size-fits-all solution to the woes of representative democracy. To begin with, they need to be seen as legitimate themselves. This will involve complex decisions over inclusiveness, allocated resources and over how to define their success. For example, would a highly participatory process suffice even if the resulting proposals are not adopted? Furthermore, the democratic potential of constitutional conventions may be frustrated in the likely event of certain options being a priori taken off the table. For instance, would a United Kingdom-wide constitutional convention have been worthy of its name working under a mandate as limited as that of the Smith Commission?

Finally, one must remember that the costs of popular constitution-making, including in terms of political will and citizen interest, will unavoidably render constitutional conventions exceptional. The majority of constitutional reforms are bound to come about via more traditional channels. Thus, focusing solely on popular involvement in times of crisis may be short-sighted and ultimately detrimental. If democracy is a work in progress, it is still representative democracy that we are working towards improving, including via boosts of participatory activity.

Keywords: Participatory Democracy, Citizen Assemblies, Constitutional Conventions, Constitutional Reform, Scottish Referendum

Suggested Citation

Suteu, Silvia, Developing Democracy Through Citizen Engagement: The Advent of Popular Participation in the United Kingdom's Constitution-Making (December 27, 2015). Also published in (2015) Vol 4 Issue 2 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2015/39, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2708617

Silvia Suteu (Contact Author)

University College London - Faculty of Laws ( email )

Bentham House
4-8 Endsleigh Gardens
London, WC1E OEG
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
92
Abstract Views
647
Rank
503,876
PlumX Metrics