Printing in England and Broadcasting in Australia: A Comparative Study of Regulatory Impulse

22 Pages Posted: 24 May 2001  

David J. Brennan

Swinburne Law School

Abstract

This article compares official regulation of printing in England from 1484 to 1695, with the regulation of broadcasting in Australia from 1905 to 2000. This comparison reveals a consistent government impulse to regulate new means of communication, until the time that new means becomes uncontrollable by regulation. It also reveals that during the period of official control, industry incumbents tend to enter into a symbiotic relationship with government. Under the terms of that relationship, regulatory compliance is accepted in return for protection from competition. The article concludes by criticising both the impulse to regulate, and the consequential relationship that emerges between government and media incumbents. It also suggests that technology-neutral and industry-neutral regulation is the only means by which regulation of public communications can be logically considered. This may be only achievable through the creation of new international content norms.

JEL Classification: K39

Suggested Citation

Brennan, David J., Printing in England and Broadcasting in Australia: A Comparative Study of Regulatory Impulse. Adelaide Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=270891 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.270891

David J. Brennan (Contact Author)

Swinburne Law School ( email )

Cnr Wakefield and William Streets, Hawthorn Victor
3122 Victoria, Victoria 3122
Australia

Paper statistics

Downloads
194
Rank
127,454
Abstract Views
2,310