Commentary: Faux Amis in Design Law

105 Trademark Rep. 1455 (2015)

6 Pages Posted: 4 Jan 2016 Last revised: 6 Apr 2016

See all articles by Sarah Burstein

Sarah Burstein

The University of Oklahoma College of Law

Date Written: January 4, 2016

Abstract

In the United States, designs can be protected under all three main intellectual property (IP) regimes. There are some key terms of art that are used in all three regimes but do not mean the same thing in each. This essay focuses on two of these faux amis, "ornamental" and "functional." It demonstrates that these terms do not mean the same thing in trademark and design patent law and that this is causing problematic confusion. It proposes that, going forward, we stop using the term "ornamental" in trademark law and stop using the term "functional" in design patent law.

Keywords: design patents, trademarks, ornamental, ornamentality, functional, functionality, design law, faux amis

Suggested Citation

Burstein, Sarah, Commentary: Faux Amis in Design Law (January 4, 2016). 105 Trademark Rep. 1455 (2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2710661

Sarah Burstein (Contact Author)

The University of Oklahoma College of Law ( email )

300 Timberdell Road
Norman, OK 73019
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.ou.edu/content/burstein-sarah

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
265
rank
108,172
Abstract Views
2,518
PlumX Metrics