The Federal Experiment with Evidence-Based Funding

9 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2016

See all articles by Philip G. Peters Jr.

Philip G. Peters Jr.

University of Missouri at Columbia - School of Law

Date Written: January 5, 2016


Federal and state governments spend hundreds of billions of dollars every year on social service and education programs that are well intentioned, but typically unproven and often ineffective. As a result, Congress and President Obama have called for greater reliance on evidence-based programs.

One of the few federal programs to condition funding on such evidence is the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (better known as the Home Visiting Program), a part of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The law’s insistence that program effectiveness be proven with rigorous research provides a promising template for future state and federal funding legislation.

Unfortunately, Congress did not complement its stiff research design requirements for the program with equally meaningful requirements for the minimum outcomes needed for a home visiting model to qualify for federal funds. At present, the law has no minimum thresholds for effect size, duration, consistency, replication, or salience. To insure that it funds the efforts most likely to improve children’s lives, Congress should add minimum requirements for each of these outcomes when it reauthorizes this funding program.

Keywords: federal, evidence-based, home visiting, children, maternal, patient protection

Suggested Citation

Peters, Philip G., The Federal Experiment with Evidence-Based Funding (January 5, 2016). 38 Regulation 40, 2015-2016, University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016-02, Available at SSRN:

Philip G. Peters (Contact Author)

University of Missouri at Columbia - School of Law ( email )

Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Hulston Hall
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
573-882-8274 (Phone)


Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics