Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The United Nations as Good Samaritan: Immunity and Responsibility

45 Pages Posted: 9 Jan 2016  

Kristen Boon

Seton Hall University - School of Law

Date Written: January 4, 2016

Abstract

Since the U.N.’s founding, its need for immunity from the jurisdiction of member states courts has been understood as necessary to achieve its purposes. Immunities, however, conflict with an individual’s right to a remedy and the law’s ordinary principles of responsibility for causing harm. This inherent conflict at the center of the immunity doctrine has evolved into a very public rift in the Haiti Cholera, Kosovo Lead Poisoning, and Mothers of Srebrenica cases against the U.N.

In these three cases alleging mass torts by the U.N., the independence of the organization is perceived by some to have trumped the dignity of affected individuals. Due to a combination of factors, including the U.N.’s broad immunities, the limited jurisdiction rationae personae of courts over international organizations (IOs), and the nascent state of the U.N.’s own internal review mechanisms, not to mention continuing debate over whether human rights obligations bind the U.N. directly under international law, these cases of human tragedy have resulted in neither compensation by the U.N. to the victims nor access to domestic courts.

This article argues that the threshold problem with the position that the U.N. is absolutely immune is that it severs ordinary legal principles: an organization is responsible for the harm it causes by its negligence. Absolute immunity also stands in contrast to the U.N.’s programmatic promotion of the Rule of Law and to the standards expected of member states. While partial immunity is justified under certain circumstances, the categorical assertion of absolute U.N. immunity does not survive an assessment of accountability, distributive justice, or economics. U.N. Member States should join the conversation about what immunities mean to the U.N. today given its contemporary mandate and impact on individuals. If they do not, there may be consequences for the U.N. that are disadvantageous for its future work.

Keywords: international law, UN immunity, Haiti Cholera Case, mass torts

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Boon, Kristen, The United Nations as Good Samaritan: Immunity and Responsibility (January 4, 2016). Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2016 Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2712326

Kristen E. Boon (Contact Author)

Seton Hall University - School of Law ( email )

One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
305
Rank
82,006
Abstract Views
1,009