Economic Analysis and the Design of Constitutional Courts
41 Pages Posted: 29 May 2001
Abstract
Though nominally exercised on behalf of citizens, constitutional judicial review also performs an insurance function for politicians who see themselves losing power in future elections. This paper discusses the various dimensions of institutional design of constitutional courts and argues that the extent and power of judicial review should increase with political uncertainty at the time of constitutional design. The paper then develops a simple empirical test of this hypothesis using data from Eastern Europe, regressing measures for various aspects of court design on the strength of the largest party in the legislature. The paper shows that the design of constitutional courts reflects the interests of dominant political parties, and that more independent and powerful courts are associated with situations of divided or deadlocked politics.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Economic Growth and Judicial Independence: Cross Country Evidence Using a New Set of Indicators
By Lars P. Feld and Stefan Voigt
-
Inflation Culture, Central Bank Independence and Price Stability
By Bernd Hayo
-
By Stefan Voigt
-
Choosing Not to Choose: When Politicians Choose to Delegate Powers
By Stefan Voigt and Eli Salzberger
-
Attitudes Towards Inflation and the Viability of Fixed Exchange Rates: Evidence from the EMS
-
A Public Choice Case for the Administrative State
By David B. Spence and Frank B. Cross
-
Making Judges Independent - Some Proposals Regarding the Judiciary
By Lars P. Feld and Stefan Voigt
-
The Economic Effects of Human Rights
By Lorenz Blume and Stefan Voigt