No Longer a Neutral Magistrate: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in the Wake of the War on Terror

62 Pages Posted: 10 Jan 2016 Last revised: 28 Apr 2016

See all articles by Walter Mondale

Walter Mondale

University of Minnesota - Minneapolis - Humphrey School of Public Affairs

Robert Stein

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law

Caitlinrose Fisher

United States Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit

Date Written: January 1, 2016

Abstract

Since the founding of our nation, the executive, judicial, and legislative branches of government have struggled with maintaining an appropriate balance between gathering intelligence for national security purposes and protecting the civil liberties of United States citizens. This difficulty is compounded by the uniquely challenging separation of powers issues national security problems present. In 1978, after the scale tipped too far toward “security” at the expense of personal liberties, the United States Senate formed the United States Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities (Church Committee) to investigate executive overreach and recommend structural and statutory changes to ensure such overreach did not occur again. In response to the Church Committee’s recommendations, among other reforms, Congress enacted the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and created the FISA Court. FISA conformed with the Church Committee’s recommendations for over two decades, but, in the wake of 9/11, Congress significantly altered FISA’s scheme, opening the door once again to executive overreach. Because of post-9/11 changes to FISA, the executive branch is able to engage in practices similar to those that catalyzed the formation of the Church Committee and the enactment of FISA.

This Article chronicles the evolution of FISA and the FISA Court. Drawing from the unique perspective of Vice President Mondale — who, while a Senator, served as a member of the Church Committee and as chairman of the subcommittee that drafted the Church Committee’s final report on domestic intelligence activities, and, as Vice President, was instrumental to the enactment of FISA — the Article analyzes the ways in which the post-9/11 Act and court are at odds with their original design. The Article concludes that such overreach is possible in part because of structural changes to the FISA Court and the executive branch’s invocation of the need for secrecy in non-FISA Court proceedings. The recently enacted FREEDOM Act addresses some “liberty” concerns but fails to fix the structural issues that currently limit the authority and efficacy of the FISA Court. The FISA Court no longer serves its intended function as a specialized Article III court of limited jurisdiction. Rather, the FISA Court is more akin to an adjunct to the executive branch, lending legitimacy to intelligence operations without practically limiting executive authority. This Article concludes by recommending tangible actions Congress can and should take to reestablish the structures and processes recommended by the Church Committee — structures and processes that limit executive authority and comport with Article III of the United States Constitution.

Keywords: foreign intelligence, national security, Walter Mondale, Church Committee, FISA, FISC, FISCR, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, State Secrets

JEL Classification: H00, H56, K00, K1, K14, K33

Suggested Citation

Mondale, Walter and Stein, Robert and Fisher, Caitlinrose, No Longer a Neutral Magistrate: The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in the Wake of the War on Terror (January 1, 2016). Minnesota Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2712892

Walter Mondale

University of Minnesota - Minneapolis - Humphrey School of Public Affairs ( email )

130 Humphrey School, 301 19th Ave. S
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Robert Stein

University of Minnesota - Twin Cities - School of Law ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Caitlinrose Fisher (Contact Author)

United States Court of Appeals - Ninth Circuit ( email )

United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
438
rank
63,996
Abstract Views
1,592
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information