Sovereign Immunity and the Constitutional Text

29 Pages Posted: 14 Jan 2016 Last revised: 8 Mar 2017

See all articles by William Baude

William Baude

University of Chicago - Law School

Date Written: March 1, 2017

Abstract

Despite the opprobrium heaped on the Supreme Court’s modern doctrine of sovereign immunity, there is a theory that makes sense of that doctrine, and also renders it consistent with the constitutional text. The theory is that sovereign immunity is a common law rule, a “backdrop,” that is not directly incorporated into the Constitution but is shielded by the Constitution from most kinds of change.

That theory also has important implications for the future of sovereign immunity. The Supreme Court’s decision in Nevada v. Hall holds that state sovereign immunity need not be respected in another state’s courts. Last term, in Franchise Tax Board v. Hyatt the Court nearly overruled Hall, and its future hangs by a single vote. The backdrop theory suggests that Nevada v. Hall is rightly decided, consistent with modern doctrine, and should not be overruled.

Keywords: sovereign immunity, state, alden, nevada v. hall, seminole tribe, constitution, text, franchise tax board, backdrops

Suggested Citation

Baude, William, Sovereign Immunity and the Constitutional Text (March 1, 2017). U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 558; 103 Virginia Law Review 1 (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2714540 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2714540

William Baude (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Law School ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
929
rank
23,419
Abstract Views
3,568
PlumX Metrics