Shareholders' Reserve Power: Implied Terms & Public Policy
Singapore Management University - School of Law
Journal of Business Law, pp. 128 – 138, 2016
Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 5/2016
Do shareholders have reserve or residual powers of management when the board is unable or unwilling to act? In Chan Siew Lee v TYC Investment Pte Ltd  5 SLR 409, the Singapore Court of Appeal answered this question in the affirmative. In so doing, the court employed a contractarian approach, rationalising the power as one that is conferred on shareholders by a term implied in the company’s constitution on the basis of necessity or business efficacy. But a closer review will demonstrate that the court’s analysis, despite its overt reliance on contractual principles, is ultimately of a hybrid nature that takes on board both contractual as well as public policy concerns. This approach aptly reflects the complex nature of the company’s internal workings and warns against a reductionist approach that tackles the issue from a monolithic (contractual) perspective.
Date posted: March 1, 2016