Combining Efficiency and Transparency in Legislative Processes

The Theory and Practice of Legislation Vol. 3(3), 2015 (peer-reviewed)

Posted: 15 Jan 2016 Last revised: 23 Aug 2017

See all articles by Wim J. M. Voermans

Wim J. M. Voermans

Leiden University - Leiden Law School

Hans-Martien ten Napel

Leiden Law School

Reijer Passchier

Leiden University - Leiden Law School

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

In this contribution, we will illustrate the modern-day dynamics of the interplay between the need for expedience and efficiency on the one hand, and the demand for openness, inclusiveness and transparency on the other by looking into one of government’s main decision-making processes: the legislative process. Particularly in the field of legislation, the balancing of both efficiency and transparency is of the essence for modern legislatures in parliamentary democracies: laws expressed by acts and legislative instruments can only be truly effective if they rest on broad societal support. As we will argue, a transparent and inclusive legislative process functions as a kind of democratic check on government action: it guarantees sufficient deliberative activity before a government may act. Throughout our contribution, a 2012 comparative study commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice, and carried out by an interdisciplinary team of researchers from Leiden University will be used as a guiding rail to illustrate some the ways in which different jurisdictions in Europe have managed to combine, or at least balance, the need for legislative efficiency and transparency. We will use this study to demonstrate how traditional legislative processes nowadays grapple to translate the will of the citizens into effective legislation, how modern administrations still need democratically underpinned legislative procedures as the basis for the legitimation of (their) decisions, how efficient delivery of decisions and careful (lengthy) scrutiny interact. On the basis of this material we will further discuss concepts of, respectively, efficiency and transparency and especially the way modern legislatures examined in the study use information and communication technology (ICT) to overcome the sometimes opposing demands on their legislative processes. Insofar as possible we will try to highlight a few ‘best practices’ that show how legislative processes can (and cannot) adapt to new present day demands.

Keywords: Legislative process, Efficiency, Transparency, ICT, Consultation, Openness, Participation

Suggested Citation

Voermans, Wim and ten Napel, Hans-Martien and Passchier, Reijer, Combining Efficiency and Transparency in Legislative Processes (2015). The Theory and Practice of Legislation Vol. 3(3), 2015 (peer-reviewed) . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2714928

Wim Voermans

Leiden University - Leiden Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 9520
2300 RA Leiden, NL-2300RA
Netherlands

Hans-Martien Ten Napel

Leiden Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 9520
2300 RA Leiden, NL-2300RA
Netherlands

Reijer Passchier (Contact Author)

Leiden University - Leiden Law School ( email )

P.O. Box 9520
2300 RA Leiden, NL-2300RA
Netherlands

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
516
PlumX Metrics