Innovation in Arbitration Law: The Case of Delaware

46 Pages Posted: 17 Jan 2016

Date Written: January 15, 2016

Abstract

Delaware has become increasingly active in adopting innovative arbitration laws. In 2009, Delaware adopted a confidential system of “arbitration” conducted by sitting Court of Chancery judges, which was subsequently held unconstitutional as violating the First Amendment right of public access to the courts. In 2015, it enacted the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act (DRAA), creating a system of expedited arbitration in Delaware. Among other things, the DRAA sets mandatory time limits for the completion of arbitration proceedings (with financial penalties for arbitrators who fail to comply), restricts the degree of court involvement in the arbitration process, and provides for expeditious review of arbitration awards directly to the Delaware Supreme Court. This Article analyzes the DRAA, Delaware’s most recent innovation in arbitration law. It distinguishes the provisions of the DRAA that require legislative action from those that the parties can themselves establish by contract. It also notes several potential difficulties with and uncertainties caused by the Act. Finally, it comments on the role of Delaware (as opposed to other American states) as an innovator in arbitration law.

Keywords: Arbitration, contracts, dispute resolution, Delaware law

JEL Classification: K12, K22, K40

Suggested Citation

Drahozal, Christopher R., Innovation in Arbitration Law: The Case of Delaware (January 15, 2016). Pepperdine Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2716381

Christopher R. Drahozal (Contact Author)

University of Kansas School of Law ( email )

Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States
785-864-9239 (Phone)
785-864-5054 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
76
Abstract Views
406
rank
309,187
PlumX Metrics