Accounting Research and Common Sense

11 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2016

See all articles by James A. Ohlson

James A. Ohlson

Hong Kong Polytechnic University - School of Accounting and Finance

Date Written: December 2015

Abstract

The paper identifies some basic shortcomings of contemporary accounting research. Aside from issues related to how researchers pick topics - they are generally too remote from pre‐existing realities - the main points concern the standard paradigm: explaining a dependent variable Y in terms of X, the primary variable of interest, while controlling for Z. The paper argues that just because the t‐statistic related to X is significant does not mean that X helps to explain Y. To address this issue requires a goodness‐of‐fit analysis that evaluates the incremental contribution of X. Such tests can show that X effectively acts as noise though X's t‐statistic is significant. Incremental goodness‐of‐fit analyses would potentially have dramatic consequences on research because rejection of the null would now take place much less often. The paper also considers problems associated with ordinary least squares, with specific emphasis on the scaling of dollar amount variables in linear cross‐sectional settings.

Keywords: Ethics, Research methodology

Suggested Citation

Ohlson, James A., Accounting Research and Common Sense (December 2015). Abacus, Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp. 525-535, 2015. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2716397 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/abac.12059

James A. Ohlson (Contact Author)

Hong Kong Polytechnic University - School of Accounting and Finance ( email )

M715, Li Ka Shing Tower
Hung Hom, Kowloon
China

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
0
Abstract Views
879
PlumX Metrics