Exploring Precedent

Law Library Journal, Vol. 107, No. 4, Pp. 605-17 (2015)

University of Washington School of Law Research Paper

14 Pages Posted: 21 Jan 2016

See all articles by Mary Whisner

Mary Whisner

University of Washington - School of Law

Date Written: December 1, 2015

Abstract

Legal researchers have many powerful tools for finding cases: Full-text searching with different interfaces from different providers, annotated statutes, digests, and a wide variety of secondary sources. But there are areas where even experienced researchers are puzzled: When will an intermediate court follow rulings of a sister court? What sources can advocates cite? (or: why can advocates cite secondary sources but not unpublished opinions?) Are fewer cases considered to be cases of first impression, since the cumulative body of precedent is so large?

This essay examines each of these questions. It is accessible to beginning students, first wrestling with the questions, but should also interest more experienced researchers.

Keywords: precedent, unpublished decisions, unpublished opinions, common law, citation of authority, legal research, legal writing

Suggested Citation

Whisner, Mary, Exploring Precedent (December 1, 2015). Law Library Journal, Vol. 107, No. 4, Pp. 605-17 (2015); University of Washington School of Law Research Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2718719

Mary Whisner (Contact Author)

University of Washington - School of Law ( email )

William H. Gates Hall
Box 353020
Seattle, WA 98105-3020
United States
206-543-7672 (Phone)
206-685-2135 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: https://www.law.washington.edu/directory/profile.aspx?ID=51

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
160
rank
173,700
Abstract Views
690
PlumX