Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

VAR Risk Measures Versus Traditional Risk Measures: An Analysis and Survey

Journal of Risk, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 1-27, 2002

34 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2002 Last revised: 29 Sep 2013

Guy Kaplanski

Bar-Ilan University - Graduate School of Business Administration

Yoram Kroll

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Department of Finance and Banking

Date Written: December 1, 2001

Abstract

The article presents an analysis and partial survey regarding the validity of VaR risk measures in comparison to traditional risk measures. The assumed individuals are either maximizing their expected utility or possess a lexicographic utility function. The analysis is carried out for generally distributed functions and for the normal and the log-normal distributions. The main conclusion is that although VaR is an inadequate measure under the expected utility framework, it is at least as good as other traditional risk measures. Moreover, it can be improved by modified versions such as the Accumulated VaR (Mean-Shortfall).

Assuming a lexicographic expected utility adds justification to the use of AVaR as a legitimate risk measure that can be further applied in the newly proposed multi-VaR risk analysis.

Keywords: VaR, risk, risk measure, lexicographic, expected utility

Suggested Citation

Kaplanski, Guy and Kroll, Yoram, VAR Risk Measures Versus Traditional Risk Measures: An Analysis and Survey (December 1, 2001). Journal of Risk, Vol. 4, Issue 3, pp. 1-27, 2002. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=271992 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.271992

Guy Kaplanski (Contact Author)

Bar-Ilan University - Graduate School of Business Administration ( email )

Ramat Gan
Israel

Yoram Kroll

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Department of Finance and Banking ( email )

Mount Scopus
Jerusalem, 91905
Israel

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,728
rank
7,636
Abstract Views
5,561