Re-Examining the Law and Economics of the Business Judgment Rule: Notes for Its Implementation in Non-US Jurisdictions

Journal of Corporate Law Studies (2018)

Ibero-American Institute for Law and Finance Working Paper No. 2/2016

27 Pages Posted: 24 Jan 2016 Last revised: 5 Feb 2018

Aurelio Gurrea-Martínez

Singapore Management University - School of Law; Ibero-American Institute for Law and Finance (IIDF); Harvard Law School - Program on International Financial Systems

Date Written: November 4, 2017

Abstract

The business judgment rule, as it has been traditionally understood, seems to be based on three underlying assumptions that make this rule economically desirable. First, directors are subject to a credible threat of being sued for a breach of the duty of care. Second, the primary role of the corporation is to maximize shareholder value. Third, shareholders are not risk averse, and therefore they just want the directors to pursue those investment projects with the highest net present value regardless of their volatility. However, this article challenges these assumptions and argues that the business judgment rule might not be desirable in some jurisdictions outside the United States and even in many US corporations. Moreover, it points out that the implementation of the business judgment rule may actually create new, unintended costs for both managers and shareholders. By re-examining the law and economics of the business judgment, this paper draws conclusions about the most efficient way to implement the business judgment rule across jurisdictions, taking into account divergences in capital markets, corporate ownership structures, the quality of courts, the level of enforcement of the duty of care, and the primary role of the corporation in different countries.

Keywords: Business judgment rule, duty of care, family businesses, corporate ownership structures, diversification, risk aversion, enforcement

Suggested Citation

Gurrea-Martínez, Aurelio, Re-Examining the Law and Economics of the Business Judgment Rule: Notes for Its Implementation in Non-US Jurisdictions (November 4, 2017). Journal of Corporate Law Studies (2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2720814 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2720814

Aurelio Gurrea-Martínez (Contact Author)

Singapore Management University - School of Law ( email )

55 Armenian Street
Singapore, 179943
Singapore
(+65) 6808-5160 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://law.smu.edu.sg/faculty

Ibero-American Institute for Law and Finance (IIDF) ( email )

C/ Bárbara de Braganza 11, 3º
Madrid, 28004
Spain
(+34) 913 91 33 99 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.derechoyfinanzas.org/en/author/aurelio/

Harvard Law School - Program on International Financial Systems ( email )

50 Church Street, 3rd Floor
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
(+1) 857-242-6072 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://pifs.law.harvard.edu/

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
801
rank
27,228
Abstract Views
2,642
PlumX