Good Faith, Bad Faith? Making an Effort in Dispute Resolution

11 Pages Posted: 26 Jan 2016

See all articles by Tania Sourdin

Tania Sourdin

University of Newcastle (Australia) - Newcastle Law School

Date Written: January 24, 2012

Abstract

The concept and meaning of good faith in negotiation and Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) processes, together with an articulation of what actions are required to comply with a good faith obligation or to support good faith negotiation, can be best described as an evolving “work in progress” in Australia. Compared with a decade ago however, good faith is a more settled and certain concept, and is increasingly being seen and applied as importing a standard of behaviour relevant to a range of participants in negotiation and ADR processes — disputants, lawyers, ADR practitioners, experts and even support people. This paper reviews the standards that have emerged, with a view to possible developments.

Keywords: good faith, bad faith, ADR, obligations, negotiation, civil procedure

Suggested Citation

Sourdin, Tania, Good Faith, Bad Faith? Making an Effort in Dispute Resolution (January 24, 2012). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2721535 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2721535

Tania Sourdin (Contact Author)

University of Newcastle (Australia) - Newcastle Law School ( email )

1 University Drive
Callaghan, 2308
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
119
Abstract Views
624
Rank
425,559
PlumX Metrics