Enter the Fox - Lumping and Splitting in the Study of Transnational Networks: A Response to Stavros Gadinis

109 American Journal of International Law Unbound 29 (2015)

Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-390

6 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2016 Last revised: 30 Jan 2016

See all articles by Robert B. Ahdieh

Robert B. Ahdieh

Texas A&M University School of Law

Date Written: January 26, 2016

Abstract

This brief essay responds to Professor Stavros Gadinis' article: "Three Pathways to Global Standards: Private, Regulator, and Ministry Networks," 109 American Journal of International Law 1 (2015). It praises the article, to begin, for its resistance to the common tendency of scholars to lump transnational regulatory networks together as a single phenomenon, and to engage them in strongly normative terms. In doing so, however, Gadinis creates something of a Humpty Dumpty problem: Once we recognize his point that networks vary widely in membership, form, and function – among other things – can we coherently collect them into smaller clusters? By reference to what criteria? Gadinis suggests some, though his analysis reveals important limitations of his resulting categories. With all that it accomplishes, however, "Three Pathways to Global Standards" helps to suggest important strands of a research agenda for scholars of transnational networks in the years ahead.

Keywords: transnational, networks, standards, standard-setting

Suggested Citation

Ahdieh, Robert B., Enter the Fox - Lumping and Splitting in the Study of Transnational Networks: A Response to Stavros Gadinis (January 26, 2016). 109 American Journal of International Law Unbound 29 (2015), Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-390, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2722946

Robert B. Ahdieh (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX 76102
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
370
PlumX Metrics