From Heresy to Orthodoxy: Substantive Legitimate Expectations in English Public Law

Matthew Groves & Greg Weeks (eds), Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law World (Hart Publishing 2016), Forthcoming

University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 5/2016

22 Pages Posted: 27 Jan 2016 Last revised: 1 Feb 2016

See all articles by Mark Elliott

Mark Elliott

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

Date Written: January 27, 2016

Abstract

English administrative law is unusual in the common law world for its embrace of the doctrine of substantive legitimate expectations. However, while that doctrine is now an accepted — if not yet fully settled — part of the administrative law landscape in England, it is only 20 years since it was judicially castigated as "heretical". This paper charts the development of the substantive legitimate expectation doctrine over recent decades, and critically examines the reasons for its transformation from heresy to orthodoxy.

It does so by situating the emergence of the substantive legitimate expectation principle within the context of wider changes that have taken place in English public law in recent decades, arguing that the patina of doctrinal orthodoxy that substantive legitimate expectations now enjoy is warranted. That position is advanced by reference to two lines of argument.

First, it is argued that the doctrine of substantive legitimate expectation can be understood in terms more subtle and less uncompromising than those implied by the early cases which attracted particularly critical attention, both academically and judicially.

Second, as well as addressing the substantive legitimate expectation doctrine's compatibility with orthodoxy, orthodoxy's compatibility with the doctrine is examined and two distinct but complementary propositions advanced. It is argued, on the one hand, that understandings of what orthodoxy is have evolved somewhat in the last 20 or so years. On the other hand, it is argued that understandings of what orthodoxy requires, in doctrinal terms, have also changed.

These shifting perceptions of the nature and implications of orthodoxy have served to carve out a space for the substantive legitimate expectation doctrine today which is more generous than that which previously existed. The story of the evolution of the doctrine of substantive legitimate expectation thus forms part of a larger tableau upon which is recorded the recent evolution of English administrative law itself.

Keywords: administrative law, constitutional law, public law, English law, judicial review, substantive review, legitimate expectations

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K19, K30, K39, K40

Suggested Citation

Elliott, Mark C., From Heresy to Orthodoxy: Substantive Legitimate Expectations in English Public Law (January 27, 2016). Matthew Groves & Greg Weeks (eds), Legitimate Expectations in the Common Law World (Hart Publishing 2016), Forthcoming, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 5/2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2723076

Mark C. Elliott (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,774
Abstract Views
4,395
Rank
19,301
PlumX Metrics