The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and Measuring Gender Inequality: A Technical Articulation for Asia-Pacific

Levy Economics Institute, Working Papers Series No. 859

35 Pages Posted: 5 Feb 2016

See all articles by Bhavya Aggarwal

Bhavya Aggarwal

Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Rajasthan

Lekha Chakraborty

Bard College - The Levy Economics Institute; National Institute of Public Finance and Policy

Date Written: February 3, 2016

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the 2030 UN Agenda for Sustainable Development, this paper analyzes the measurement issues in gender-based indices constructed by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and suggests alternatives for choice of variables, functional form, and weights. While the UNDP Gender Inequality Index (GII) conceptually reflects the loss in achievement due to inequality between men and women in three dimensions — health, empowerment, and labor force participation — we argue that the assumptions and the choice of variables to capture these dimensions remain inadequate and erroneous, resulting in only the partial capture of gender inequalities. Since the dimensions used for the GII are different from those in the UNDP’s Human Development Index (HDI), we cannot say that a higher value in the GII represents a loss in the HDI due to gender inequalities. The technical obscurity remains how to interpret GII by combining women-specific indicators with indicators that are disaggregated for both men and women. The GII is a partial construct, as it does not capture many significant dimensions of gender inequality. Though this requires a data revolution, we tried to reconstruct the GII in the context of Asia-Pacific using three scenarios: (1) improving the set of variables incorporating unpaid care work, pay gaps, intrahousehold decision making, exposure to knowledge networks, and feminization of governance at local levels; (2) constructing a decomposed index to specify the direction of gender gaps; and (3) compiling an alternative index using Principal Components Index for assigning weights. The choice of countries under the three scenarios is constrained by data paucity. The results reveal that the UNDP GII overestimates the gap between the two genders, and that using women-specific indicators leads to a fallacious estimation of gender inequality. The estimates are illustrative. The implication of the results broadly suggests a return to the UNDP Gender Development Index for capturing gender development, with an improvised set of choices and variables.

Keywords: Gender Inequality, Unpaid Work, Human Development, Composite Indicator

JEL Classification: D63, J16, J31, O15

Suggested Citation

Aggarwal, Bhavya and Chakraborty, Lekha S., The 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and Measuring Gender Inequality: A Technical Articulation for Asia-Pacific (February 3, 2016). Levy Economics Institute, Working Papers Series No. 859, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2727427 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727427

Bhavya Aggarwal

Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Rajasthan ( email )

Pilani
Rajasthan
India

Lekha S. Chakraborty (Contact Author)

Bard College - The Levy Economics Institute ( email )

New York

National Institute of Public Finance and Policy ( email )

New Delhi
India

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
116
Abstract Views
756
Rank
377,814
PlumX Metrics