The Spillover Effect of Consolidating Securitization Entities on Small Business Lending
The Accounting Review, Forthcoming
52 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2016 Last revised: 26 Jan 2021
Date Written: January 25, 2021
Abstract
I investigate how the consolidation of securitization entities under SFAS 166 and 167 spills over to banks’ supply of small business loans, which are rarely securitized in the United States. This spillover operates through two channels. (1) In the leverage channel, consolidating banks downsize their entire loan portfolios, both small business loans and other loans, in response to increased leverage after consolidation. (2) In the risk management channel, consolidating banks adjust the mix of loans to maintain optimal diversification. The adjustment can increase the supply of small business loans when their performance covaries positively with the performance of other loans. I find that on average, banks that consolidate more securitized assets reduce small business lending; consequently, counties with a greater market share of consolidating banks experience slower growth in small businesses. I also identify a small group of banks with sufficiently large positive performance covariance that increase small business lending.
Keywords: SFAS 166 and 167; off‒balance sheet; spillovers; leverage; risk management; performance covariance; small business lending
JEL Classification: M4; G21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation