Why Restrain Alienation of Indigenous Lands?

49:3 University of British Columbia Law Review 997 (2016)

64 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2016 Last revised: 10 Jan 2017

See all articles by Malcolm Lavoie

Malcolm Lavoie

University of Alberta Faculty of Law

Date Written: May 20, 2015

Abstract

This paper provides the first comprehensive account of the rule against alienating indigenous lands to private parties, that is to say, parties other than the government. This rule exists, in common law and statutory forms, across common law settler societies, including the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The author provides an historical account of the development of the rule, outlining the ways in which the rule was seen to be justified across different time periods. The paper argues that none of the historical bases for the rule, which range from considerations of military strategy to outright racial paternalism, can provide an adequate justification for the rule in the present day. After providing an account of the current legal regimes in these four countries, the author sets out a contemporary justification for the rule, rooted in the collective autonomy and cultural integrity of indigenous groups. This is approached primarily from two angles. In economic or welfare-oriented terms, alienations of parts of a community's land base may impose a cost on members of the group by reducing the group's capacity to preserve its culture and way of life, goods which can only be enjoyed in collective form. Alternatively, one can take collective autonomy and cultural preservation as goods not fully reducible to welfare. Erosions of the group's land base impinge on its ability to exercise collective autonomy, especially if governance jurisdiction is linked to land ownership. The paper also considers the relevance of arguments based on indigenous sovereignty and distinctive indigenous approaches to land. Finally, the author outlines a set of promising alternative institutional arrangements that might reconcile the interests at stake in ways other than through a rigid prohibition on alienation to private parties.

Suggested Citation

Lavoie, Malcolm, Why Restrain Alienation of Indigenous Lands? (May 20, 2015). 49:3 University of British Columbia Law Review 997 (2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2728376 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2728376

Malcolm Lavoie (Contact Author)

University of Alberta Faculty of Law ( email )

Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5
Canada

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
158
Abstract Views
928
rank
186,080
PlumX Metrics