Forthcoming in European Journal of Risk Regulation
12 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2016 Last revised: 31 Mar 2016
Date Written: February 6, 2016
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has received considerable academic attention for its newly acquired regulatory powers and the issues of legitimacy and controls concerning its far-reaching powers. ESMA’s supervisory tasks are not less impressive but they are underinvestigated. In light of the recent English judgement on the exercise of ESMA’s inspection powers in the UK, this paper focuses on the question of judicial control over inspection power of ESMA. It shows that judicial control has been established in principle. However, the existing legal framework based on different national procedures allows ESMA escaping judicial control by chance or on purpose. The article argues for the necessity of addressing the spotted controlling gap by, for instance, eliminating the differences or limiting inspection-related discretion and promoting judicial cooperation. Since EU and national enforcement powers have become increasingly shared, the system of control cannot remain completely separated, as it is the case today. How the EU supervisor is to be controlled should not be up to the EU supervisor to choose.
Keywords: supervision, enforcement, EU, national, ESMA, investigation, inspection, accountability, judicial protection, national procedural autonomy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
van Rijsbergen, Marloes and Scholten, Miroslava, ESMA Inspecting: The Implications for Judicial Control Under Shared Enforcement (February 6, 2016). Forthcoming in European Journal of Risk Regulation. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2728741 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2728741