FERC v. EPSA: Functionalism and the Electricity Industry of the Future

11 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2016 Last revised: 30 Apr 2016

Date Written: February 6, 2016


This Essay addresses the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply Association. The decision has received a level of popular attention that is almost unprecedented for a case involving electricity regulation. Nevertheless, one of the decision’s most jurisprudentially significant aspects has gone largely unnoticed. In ruling for FERC, the Court adopted a deeply functionalist approach to the Federal Power Act’s division of jurisdiction between state and federal regulators. In so doing, the Court cited with approval a number of pragmatic steps that FERC took to manage the jurisdictional challenges posed by new technologies for generating and consuming electricity. This is a laudable development. As the Essay explains, this functionalist approach will empower FERC to adapt the FPA to meet these new challenges while nevertheless remaining consistent with the FPA’s overarching purpose.

Keywords: Energy law, statutory interpretation, supreme court

Suggested Citation

Christiansen, Matthew, FERC v. EPSA: Functionalism and the Electricity Industry of the Future (February 6, 2016). 68 Stanford Law Review Online 100 (2016), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2728764 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2728764

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics