Jenkins v. Kingsgate and the Migration of the US Disparate Impact Doctrine in EU Law

EU Law Stories, Bill Davies and Fernanda Nicola ed., Cambridge University Press (2017)

30 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2016 Last revised: 26 Oct 2017

See all articles by Ioanna Tourkochoriti

Ioanna Tourkochoriti

Harvard Law School; National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG) - School of Law; University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law

Date Written: February 11, 2016

Abstract

Jenkins v. Kingsgate is a landmark case of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) that demonstrates the travel and change of legal ideas as they migrate from the United States (US) to the European Union (EU). By discussing the idea of “indirect discrimination” in reference to the US experience, Jenkins consolidates the notion of dispelling discrimination due to the adverse impact of a neutral rule or policy. In Jenkins, Advocate General Warner of the CJEU referred explicitly to the US Supreme Court case Griggs v. Duke Power Co. to trace a parallel between the situation of African Americans in the United States and women in Europe. The story of Jenkins is a stark example of the migration of legal ideas, which operates in a different way in the new context. The paper analyses Jenkins and proposes an interpretation of the divergence in the operation of the same concept in the US and the EU. A key factor in this story is the radically different conception of the role of the government on either side of the Atlantic. Jenkins is in line with wider EU policies favoring an idiosyncratic combination of free market liberal economy that promotes social inclusion. This combination demonstrates an acceptance of state interventions in the EU that is much greater than what is acceptable in the US, where the government cannot define wages in a way that appears “just”.

Keywords: indirect discrimination, disparate impact, US, EU, UK, Jenkins v. Kingsgate, Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

Suggested Citation

Tourkochoriti, Ioanna, Jenkins v. Kingsgate and the Migration of the US Disparate Impact Doctrine in EU Law (February 11, 2016). EU Law Stories, Bill Davies and Fernanda Nicola ed., Cambridge University Press (2017), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731350

Ioanna Tourkochoriti (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

125 Mt Auburn st, 3rd Floor
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

HOME PAGE: http://scholar.harvard.edu/tourkochoriti

National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG) - School of Law ( email )

University Road
Galway
Ireland
353 (0)91 492389 (Phone)
353 (0) 91 494506 (Fax)

University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
152
Abstract Views
685
rank
217,714
PlumX Metrics