Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731474
 


 



A Critical Assessment of the Role of the Venice Commission in Processes of Domestic Constitutional Reform


Maartje De Visser


Singapore Management University; Maastricht University, Department of International and European Law; Tilburg University

December 1, 2015

American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 63(4), No. 4, pp. 1-35, 2015
Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 2/2016

Abstract:     
Since its inception in 1990, the services of the European Commission for Democracy through Law – more commonly known as the Venice Commission – to advise and assist on constitutional reform projects are engaged with a growing frequency, by both European and non-European states. This development means that the Venice Commission is rapidly becoming an actor of significance in constitutional engineering and, further, that its involvement in processes of constitutional changes across different jurisdictions may generate convergence in national constitutional designs and approach. This article offers an analysis of the Venice Commission’s performance of this role, using its recent participation in constitutional reform projects in Iceland, Tunisia, Belgium and Hungary as case studies. More particularly, it questions whether the current approach of the Venice Commission – characterized by virtually unbridled flexibility and pragmatism – is still appropriate given its evolution to an internationally recognized independent authority on constitutional matters. The article argues that safeguarding, and ideally enhancing, the quality and acceptability of the opinions prepared by the Venice Commission for the benefit of national constitution-makers calls for a more elaborate set of procedural rules governing its working methods and a greater degree of sophistication in identifying the shared constitutional standards used to evaluate constitutional changes contemplated by its member states. The Commission should further be more attentive to the implications of having a growing number of non-European states among its members and take measures to ensure that all its members are treated in a consistent fashion and with due regard for their equality in status as democratic nations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Venice Commission, constitution-making processes, rules of procedure, common constitutional heritage, migration of constitutional models, Iceland, Tunisia, Belgium, Hungary


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 13, 2016 ; Last revised: February 29, 2016

Suggested Citation

De Visser, Maartje, A Critical Assessment of the Role of the Venice Commission in Processes of Domestic Constitutional Reform (December 1, 2015). American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 63(4), No. 4, pp. 1-35, 2015 ; Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 2/2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2731474

Contact Information

Maartje De Visser (Contact Author)
Singapore Management University ( email )
60, Stamford Road
Level 4
Singapore, 178900
Singapore

Maastricht University, Department of International and European Law ( email )
United States
Tilburg University ( email )
Postbus 90153
Tilburg, DC 5000 LE
Netherlands
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 257
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 210,888