The Currency of Taxation

39 Pages Posted: 22 Feb 2016 Last revised: 16 Jun 2019

See all articles by Tsilly Dagan

Tsilly Dagan

University of Oxford, Faculty of Law; Bar Ilan University

Date Written: February 17, 2016

Abstract

This paper focuses on a systemic phenomenon through which the powerful social instrument of income taxation contributes to the construction of our identities as well as our interactions with one another. Tax inevitably compares people and their behavior, assesses individual attributes, interpersonal interactions, and social institutions, and then converts them into “the currency of taxation.”

The process of comparing, measuring, and classifying attributes and interactions challenges and, at times, even reconstruct the reality it is intended to measure. It thereby shapes our identities in a number of ways. It translates reality into a continuous linear (lexical) function, with a distinctive starting point (zero liability) along a steady monetary scale. The elements of this mechanism — its starting point, units, and monistic, lexical order — are not simply components of the technical apparatus of the income tax system but normative choices. Like any baseline, the currency of taxation sets, reflects, and reinforces norms. Like any scale, it highlights certain aspects of our lives and overrides others. Like any conversion mechanism, it purports to represent the true worth of items on the scale, but something often gets lost in the translation. And like any lexical order, it treats items as commensurable and their “values” on the scale as comparable.

This paper illustrates these identity-related aspects of the currency of taxation through four test cases that represent different aspects of a person's identity: the deduction of commuting expenses; the distinction made between gifts and barters; the Israeli kibbutz communities; and personal-based international taxation.

Keywords: Income Taxation, Identity, Commodification

Suggested Citation

Dagan, Tsilly, The Currency of Taxation (February 17, 2016). 84 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 2537 (2016).. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2733457

Tsilly Dagan (Contact Author)

University of Oxford, Faculty of Law ( email )

St Cross Building
St Cross Rd
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom

Bar Ilan University ( email )

Ramat Gan
Ramat Gan, 52900
Israel

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
66
Abstract Views
488
rank
362,533
PlumX Metrics