14 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2016 Last revised: 27 May 2016
Date Written: May 26, 2016
The net neutrality norm generates wealth transfers from one type of internet content provider to another. In theory, these transfers might be socially desirable, and could be justified on the basis of informational externalities similar to those that have been identified to justify the fair use doctrine in copyright law. However, in practice, the conditions that justify fair use in the copyright context do not appear to hold in the settings in which the net neutrality principle operates. Moreover, the internal subsidization required by net neutrality generates a transfer from the relatively poor to the relatively rich. The potential welfare gains that might come from controlling anticompetitive abuse or government coercion through implementation of the policy can be achieved by alternative policies with less harmful consequences.
Keywords: net neutrality, vertical integration, anticompetitive exclusion, telecommunications regulation, subsidy, fair use
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hylton, Keith N., Law, Social Welfare, and Net Neutrality (May 26, 2016). Review of Industrial Organization, Forthcoming; Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 16-08. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2736541
By David Evans