Litigation Privilege: Timeless or Transient? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)

(2007) 11 International Journal of Evidence & Proof pp. 322-328

8 Pages Posted: 26 Feb 2016

See all articles by James Goudkamp

James Goudkamp

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

Litigation privilege has become unfashionable. It is under attack on multiple fronts throughout the common law world. In the United Kingdom, perhaps the most notable inroad on the privilege is that made by the House of Lords in Re L (A Minor) (Police Investigation: Privilege). In that case it was held that the privilege is an incident of adversarial proceedings and that, consequently, it did not obtain in respect of material generated for the purposes of proceedings that were not predominantly adversarial in nature. There are signs that more radical restrictions are to come. In Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 6) Lord Scott of Foscote foreshadowed that a fundamental reconsideration of litigation privilege may be necessary?

Keywords: civil procedure, privilege

JEL Classification: K41

Suggested Citation

Goudkamp, James, Litigation Privilege: Timeless or Transient? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice) (2007). (2007) 11 International Journal of Evidence & Proof pp. 322-328. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2737639

James Goudkamp (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St Cross Building
St Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UL
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
rank
348,702
Abstract Views
348
PlumX Metrics