Empirical Reflections: A Statistical Evaluation of Bar Exam Program Interventions

39 Pages Posted: 27 Feb 2016 Last revised: 14 Aug 2016

See all articles by Scott Johns

Scott Johns

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Date Written: February 25, 2016

Abstract

The bar exam seems like a formidable hurdle to many law students. Consistent with approaches at other law schools, the University of Denver Sturm College of Law instituted a Bar Passage Program, primarily aimed at academically struggling students, consisting of three core components – a second year legal analysis course, a final semester pre-bar legal analysis problem-solving course, and a post-graduate supplemental bar success workshop program. This article walks through the step-by-step processes of statistically evaluating such interventions and explores whether such interventions are statistically warranted, particularly for students that struggled academically in law school. Using data over the course of a three-year period, this article finds that active learning participation in the Bar Passage Program is beneficial to students, in particular, those who struggled academically in law school.

Keywords: bar exam, LSAT, LGPA, law school grades, legal analysis, graduation, experiential learning, active learning, statistics, statistical analysis, regression, writing assignments, writing feedback

Suggested Citation

Johns, Scott, Empirical Reflections: A Statistical Evaluation of Bar Exam Program Interventions (February 25, 2016). 54 U. Louisville L. Rev. 35-72 (2016), U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-06, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2738036

Scott Johns (Contact Author)

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
727
Abstract Views
2,811
Rank
65,478
PlumX Metrics