Comparative Reflections on Miscarriages of Justice in Australia and Canada

(2015) 17 Flinders Law Journal 381

51 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2016

See all articles by Kent Roach

Kent Roach

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Date Written: December 28, 2015


This article identifies comparative scholarship as a promising way to understand the causes of and remedies for wrongful convictions. The article starts by suggesting that a string of high-profile DNA exonerations and public inquiries examining their systemic causes have led to Canadian judges and prosecutors accepting the reality of wrongful convictions more readily than most of their Australian counterparts. The next part of this article suggests that Australian legislatures have been more active than the Canadian Parliament in regulating police and prosecutorial behavior that contributes to wrongful convictions. In turn, the Canadian judiciary has been more creative in responding to the causes of wrongful convictions than the Australian judiciary. This theme is carried over to the next part which examines Australian legislative innovations such as second appeals based on fresh and compelling evidence and mechanisms for courts to conduct their own inquiries. Except for some 2002 reforms to the petition procedure, most reforms in Canada have come from the courts. They include the Supreme Court of Canada hearing fresh evidence or remitting cases to Courts of Appeal to do so and the granting of bail pending petition decisions by the executive and judicial review of such decisions. Australia and Canada can learn from each other in order to ensure that both legislatures and courts respond to wrongful convictions and that, where appropriate, there be both systemic and individual accountability for wrongful convictions.

Keywords: Miscarriages of Justice, Wrongful Convictions, Australia, Canada, Appeals, Criminal Justice

Suggested Citation

Roach, Kent, Comparative Reflections on Miscarriages of Justice in Australia and Canada (December 28, 2015). (2015) 17 Flinders Law Journal 381, Available at SSRN:

Kent Roach (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1
416-946-5645 (Phone)
416-978-2648 (Fax)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics