Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Is Theocracy Our Politics? Thoughts on William Baude's 'Is Originalism Our Law?'

17 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2016 Last revised: 14 May 2016

Richard Primus

University of Michigan Law School

Date Written: March 4, 2016

Abstract

William Baude argues that the prevailing practices of the American judiciary are originalist. But perhaps they are so, if they are so, at the level of discourse rather than at the level of decisionmaking. Judges do speak respectfully of original meanings, but it is not clear that this speech constrains (or should constrain) the substance of their decisions. It does not follow that judges are being purposefully duplicitous about their engagement with original meanings, but perhaps the function of that speech is not best understood as sounding in decisionmaking. Perhaps it is something like the practice among senior American political officials of invoking God in public settings -- a practice that tells us something about the self-conceptions of the speakers and the audiences to whom they speak, but not something that shapes, or that should shape, decisionmaking on contested issues.

Keywords: constitutional interpretation, constitutional law, originalism

Suggested Citation

Primus, Richard, Is Theocracy Our Politics? Thoughts on William Baude's 'Is Originalism Our Law?' (March 4, 2016). Columbia Law Review Sidebar, Vol. 116, May 2016; U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 497. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2742235

Richard Primus (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-647-5543 (Phone)
734-764-8309 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
154
Rank
161,153
Abstract Views
670