Rape Law Gatekeeping

52 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2016 Last revised: 10 Nov 2017

Date Written: August 12, 2016


Police across the United States regularly act as hostile gatekeepers who prevent rape complaints from advancing through the criminal justice system by fervently policing the culturally disputed concept of “rape.” Victims are regularly disbelieved, rape kits are discarded without investigation, and, as a result, rapists remain free. The substantial empirical evidence and stories from victims across the United States demonstrate that any success in decreasing sexual violence hinges on removing the numerous police-imposed obstacles inhibiting investigation and adjudication in rape cases, beginning with substantial reform of police practices. An examination of modern cases and the historical record indicates that the widespread conventional wisdom among academics and activists that reforming evidentiary rules and consent standards would trickle down to police decisions has proven unwarranted. As long as rape victims do not have consistent access to the criminal justice system due to policing failures, tinkering with rules and statutes is likely to yield little progress. Consequently, reform efforts must prioritize fixing the most significant bottleneck in rape cases: police. Several such legal and policy changes are incorporated into a model statute designed to ameliorate the wide-spread, ongoing problems associated with police gatekeeping.

Keywords: Rape, Sexual Assault, Police

Suggested Citation

Yung, Corey Rayburn, Rape Law Gatekeeping (August 12, 2016). 58 Boston College Law Review 205 (2017), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2742855 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2742855

Corey Rayburn Yung (Contact Author)

University of Kansas School of Law ( email )

Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics