48 Pages Posted: 27 Jul 2001
In a 1992 colloquy held in the pages of the Business Lawyer, Professors Louis Loss and Elliott Weiss debated the scope of liability under section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Following the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gustafson vs. Alloyd Co., the Business Lawyer invited Professor Stephen Bainbridge to substitute for Professor Loss as the defender of a broad interpretation of section 12(2) [subsequently re-numbered section 12(a)(2)]. In this article, Bainbridge argues that the Gustafson decision limited liability under section 12(2) to misrepresentations and omissions committed in connection with public offerings of securities. Bainbridge criticizes the Gustafson decision on a variety of grounds, including its inconsistency with prior precedent, the text of the statute, and the Act's legislative history.
JEL Classification: K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Bainbridge, Stephen M., Securities Act Section 12 (2) After the Gustafson Debacle. Business Lawyer, Vol. 50, Pp. 1231, 1995. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=274428 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.274428