Do Academics Doubt Their Own Research?

29 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2016

See all articles by Lee Stapleton

Lee Stapleton

University of Sussex - Science and Technology Policy Research Unit (SPRU)

Date Written: August 14, 2015

Abstract

When do experts doubt or question their own previously published research and why? An online survey was designed and distributed across academic staff and postgraduate research students at different universities in Great Britain. Respondents (n=202-244) identified the likelihoods of six different (quasi) hypothetical occurrences causing them to doubt or question work they have published in peer reviewed journals. They are: two objective and two semi-objective citation based metrics, plus two semi-objective metrics based on verbalised reactions. Only limited support is found from this study to suggest that the authors of primary research would agree with any judgements made by others about their research based on these metrics. The occurrence most likely to cause respondents to doubt or question their previously published research was where the majority of citing studies suggested mistakes in their work. In a multivariate context, only age and nationality are significant determinants of doubt beyond average likelihoods. Understanding and acknowledging what makes authors of primary research doubt their own research could increase the validity of those who pass judgement.

Keywords: citations, criticism, experts, meta-analysis, peers, systematic reviews

Suggested Citation

Stapleton, Lee, Do Academics Doubt Their Own Research? (August 14, 2015). SWPS 2015-24, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2744576 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2744576

Lee Stapleton (Contact Author)

University of Sussex - Science and Technology Policy Research Unit (SPRU) ( email )

Mantell Building
Falmer
Brighton BN1 9RH UK, Sussex
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
41
Abstract Views
639
PlumX Metrics