Asset Allocation in Retirement: Does Glide Path Matter?

28 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2016

See all articles by Osei Wiafe

Osei Wiafe

Griffith University

Anup K. Basu

Queensland University of Technology; Financial Research Network (FIRN)

En-Te (John) Chen

Queensland University of Technology; Financial Research Network (FIRN)

Date Written: October 12, 2015

Abstract

We compare the performance of the commonly nominated default retirement investment option, the lifecycle fund, to alternative investment strategies during retirees’ decumulation phase. Under different shortfall risk measures, we find balanced portfolios with constant exposure to equities, equity dominated portfolios as well as ‘reverse lifecycle’ portfolios that increase exposures to equities over time to consistently outperform the conventional lifecycle portfolio. While an increasing equity glidepath improves the performance of an investment strategy, the starting asset allocations are equally important. Using a utility-of-terminal wealth approach which allows for loss aversion as discussed in prospect theory by Kahneman and Tversky (1979), we find the Growth portfolio to dominate the alternative strategies at low and moderate thresholds. With increasing wealth threshold levels, a strategy with all equity allocations becomes dominant. The lifecycle portfolio is dominated by the ‘reverse lifecycle’ portfolio at all threshold levels.

Keywords: Asset Allocation, Lifecycle, Prospect Theory, Glidepath, Shortfall Risk, Retirement

Suggested Citation

Wiafe, Osei and Basu, Anup K. and Chen, En-Te, Asset Allocation in Retirement: Does Glide Path Matter? (October 12, 2015). Netspar Discussion Paper No. 10/2015-078. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2744688 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2744688

Osei Wiafe (Contact Author)

Griffith University ( email )

170 Kessels Road
Nathan, Queensland QLD 4111
Australia

Anup K. Basu

Queensland University of Technology ( email )

2 George Street
Brisbane, Queensland 4000
Australia

Financial Research Network (FIRN)

C/- University of Queensland Business School
St Lucia, 4071 Brisbane
Queensland
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.firn.org.au

En-Te Chen

Queensland University of Technology ( email )

GPO Box 2434
2 George Street
Brisbane, Queensland 4001
Australia
61-7-3864-2658 (Phone)
61-7-3864-1500 (Fax)

Financial Research Network (FIRN)

C/- University of Queensland Business School
St Lucia, 4071 Brisbane
Queensland
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.firn.org.au

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
156
Abstract Views
629
rank
198,474
PlumX Metrics