Judicial Review of Direct Democracy: A Reappraisal

28 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2016 Last revised: 1 Mar 2017

See all articles by Michael Solimine

Michael Solimine

University of Cincinnati - College of Law

Date Written: February 24, 2017

Abstract

In his dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (2015), Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the Supreme Court had been inconsistent in the rigor it employs when considering constitutional challenges to the products of direct democracy, i.e., referenda and initiatives. Some cases seemed to use stricter scrutiny, and others lesser scrutiny, as compared to challenges to ordinary legislation. Justice Thomas argued that the review of direct democracy should be the same as for ordinary legislation, and this Article agrees. It challenges the position advanced by Professor Julian Eule 25 years ago, and others since then, that the process and products of direct democracy are suspicious enough to warrant stricter judicial scrutiny. In contrast, this Article contends that, on the whole, direct democracy is sufficiently similar to ordinary legislation, and not particularly invasive of minority rights, such that no special judicial hostility is warranted.

Keywords: direct democracy, referenda, referendum, initiatives, ballot initiatives, judicial review, standard of review, judicial scrutiny, Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission

JEL Classification: K10,K41

Suggested Citation

Solimine, Michael, Judicial Review of Direct Democracy: A Reappraisal (February 24, 2017). Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 104, page 671 2016; U of Cincinnati Public Law Research Paper No. 16.06. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2744777

Michael Solimine (Contact Author)

University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
513-556-0102 (Phone)
513-556-1236 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
120
Abstract Views
516
rank
234,664
PlumX Metrics