Pitfalls in the Use of Time as an Explanatory Variable in Regression
41 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2001 Last revised: 1 Feb 2023
Date Written: November 1983
Abstract
Regression of a trendless random walk on time produces R-squared values around .44 regardless of sample length. The residuals from the regression exhibit only about 14 percent as much variation as the original series even though the underlying process has no functional dependence on time. The autocorrelation structure of these "detrended" random walks is pseudo-cyclical and purely artifactual. Conventional tests for trend are strongly biased towards finding a trend when none is present, and this effect is only partially mitigated by Cochrane-Orcutt correction for autocorrelation. The results are extended to show that pairs of detrended random walks exhibit spurious correlation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Joseph Gyourko and Joseph S. Tracy
-
The Wage Structure and the Sorting of Workers into the Public Sector
-
Collective Bargaining and Compulsory Arbitration: Prescriptions for the Blue Flu
-
Does School District Consolidation Cut Costs?
By William D. Duncombe and John Yinger
-
How Do Public Sector Wages and Employment Respond to Economic Conditions
-
How Do Public Sector Wages and Employment Respond to Economic Conditions