Comparative Analysis as an Autonomization Strategy in International Commercial Arbitration

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018, Forthcoming

University of Copenhagen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2016-14

iCourts Working Paper Series No. 48

23 Pages Posted: 12 Mar 2016 Last revised: 19 Feb 2018

See all articles by Joanna Jemielniak

Joanna Jemielniak

University of Copenhagen - iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts

Date Written: March 10, 2016

Abstract

The article explores the unique character of international commercial arbitration as a globalized phenomenon, where universalizing and harmonizing effects have largely been achieved by private means and spontaneous expansion, outside the States’ direct intervention and control. The evolution of arbitration in recent decades from an alternative to the core mechanism of deciding cross-border commercial controversies is considered. Privatization of this area of dispute resolution is examined in the context of its growing autonomization, marked — as observed by Emmanuel Gaillard — by notable changes in its theoretical representations and narratives.

This specific conceptual, institutional, and procedural framework of commercial arbitration reflects the demands of decision-making exercised in a legally, linguistically, and culturally diversified environment. Interpretation and application of law in arbitral cases requires skillful navigation between the rules of domestic, international and transnational origin, performed not only on the level of substantive norms, but also on those involving conflict of laws and procedure. As a consequence, comparative analysis plays a critical and complex role in arbitral decision-making, reaching beyond the mere demands of rendition of relevant provisions, and has been defined sensu largo as a ‘comparative mindset’, characteristic to international commercial arbitration. The article examines this phenomenon and its mechanics, challenges for legal professions and the effect of transnationalization of relevant domestic rules. It also explains the role of comparative analysis as an important instrument, used strategically in the processes of autonomization of commercial arbitration.

Keywords: arbitration, legal interpretation, comparative analysis, commercial dispute resolution

Suggested Citation

Jemielniak, Joanna, Comparative Analysis as an Autonomization Strategy in International Commercial Arbitration (March 10, 2016). International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018, Forthcoming; University of Copenhagen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2016-14; iCourts Working Paper Series No. 48. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2745920 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2745920

Joanna Jemielniak (Contact Author)

University of Copenhagen - iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts ( email )

Studiestraede 6
Copenhagen, DK-1455
Denmark

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
125
rank
216,840
Abstract Views
621
PlumX Metrics