Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Jurisdiction and Its Effects

42 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2016 Last revised: 3 Apr 2017

Scott Dodson

University of California Hastings College of the Law

Date Written: August 11, 2016

Abstract

Jurisdiction is experiencing an identity crisis. The Court has given jurisdiction three different identities: jurisdiction as power, jurisdiction as defined effects, and jurisdiction as positive law. These identities are at war with each other, and each is unsustainable on its own. The result has been a breakdown in the application of the basic question of what is jurisdictional and what is not.

I aim to rehabilitate jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is none of the three identities above. Rather, jurisdiction determines forum in a multi-forum system. It seeks not to limit a particular court in isolation but instead to define boundaries and relationships among forums. Because it speaks to relationships generally, jurisdiction exhibits neither unique nor immutable effects. Instead, positive law can prescribe whatever effects - including waivability, forfeitability, and even equitable discretion - best fit a particular jurisdictional rule.

This identity for jurisdiction resolves tensions across a wide range of doctrines. For example, it reconciles personal jurisdiction and original subject-matter jurisdiction as jurisdictional kin, a pair long estranged because of personal jurisdiction’s waivability. Other categorizations are more surprising. For example, venue, abstention, and even the Federal Arbitration Act are all jurisdictional because they select among forums, while Article III standing is non-jurisdictional because it does not. These categorizations are unconventional, but they ultimately produce a more coherent, consistent, and useful jurisdictional identity.

Keywords: jurisdiction, standing, mootness, waiver, abstention, venue, FAA, personal jurisdiction, diversity, appellate, forum non conveniens

Suggested Citation

Dodson, Scott, Jurisdiction and Its Effects (August 11, 2016). 105 Georgetown Law Journal 619 (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2746575

Scott Dodson (Contact Author)

University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )

200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
415-581-8959 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.uchastings.edu/faculty-administration/faculty/dodson/index.html

Paper statistics

Downloads
127
Rank
188,293
Abstract Views
469