Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Variations of Institutional Design for Empowered Deliberation

Journal of Public Deliberation, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, Article 2.

34 Pages Posted: 17 Mar 2016  

Carolina Johnson

University of Washington

John Gastil

Pennsylvania State University

Date Written: May 12, 2015

Abstract

This paper lays out the practical and theoretical characteristics of formally empowered deliberation as a distinctive subset of deliberative processes. As part of a recent broad shift toward a more deliberative conception of democratic politics, participatory deliberative processes increasingly have been formally empowered as part of democratic governance. Governments have moved to delegate authority and deliberative responsibility from elite bodies to lay publics more quickly than scholars have been able to fully identify the implications of this institutionalization for the quality of both deliberation and democracy. This paper describes the emerging characteristics of formally empowered deliberation as a distinctive subset of deliberative processes, in which deliberation between members of the general public is given credible formal authority over policy development and decision making. We first develop a clearer conceptualization of empowered deliberation within the general trend toward participatory governance. We also review critical and supportive perspectives on empowered deliberation, making explicit tradeoffs inherent in the decision to develop an empowered deliberative process. Next, we identify four key dimensions of variation in the design of empowered deliberative institutions, in particular embeddedness in the social/political context and the scope of authority of the deliberative decision. To illustrate these dimensions, we discuss key cases from around the world, noting which forms of empowered deliberation have seen less common innovation and documentation. Finally, we briefly consider how specific processes may become empowered or transform over time, as they transition from experimental or one-off pilot projects to recurring and institutionalized aspects of democratic governance.

Keywords: deliberative democracy, democratic innovation, participatory governance, legitimacy, participatory democracy

Suggested Citation

Johnson, Carolina and Gastil, John, Variations of Institutional Design for Empowered Deliberation (May 12, 2015). Journal of Public Deliberation, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, Article 2.. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2748344

Carolina Johnson

University of Washington ( email )

Seattle, WA 98195
United States

John Gastil (Contact Author)

Pennsylvania State University ( email )

University Park, PA 16802
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
15
Abstract Views
137