Peaks and Troughs of the U.K. Deferred Prosecution Agreement: The Lesson Learned from the First-Ever DPA between the SFO and ICBC SB PLC

Journal of Business Law, Sweet and Maxwell (Forthcoming)

Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 223/2016

30 Pages Posted: 17 Mar 2016

See all articles by Costantino Grasso

Costantino Grasso

University of East London - School of Business and Law

Date Written: March 16, 2016

Abstract

Schedule 17 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013 introduced Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) into the English legal system. On the 30th of November 2015 the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited entered into the first-ever deferred prosecution agreement in the U.K. with the Serious Fraud Office. It represents a historic turning point for the English legal system as well as an innovation that has the potential to revolutionise the approach to corporate criminal liability traditionally adopted in the United Kingdom. This paper analyses the legislative provisions under Schedule 17 of the 2013 Act dealing with its most problematic aspects and drawing comparisons with the corresponding legal instruments developed in the U.S. It also investigates the reasons behind the DPA implementation in England and Wales focusing on the growing pressure that was exerted on the authorities to carry out successful investigations against corporations involved in criminal activities. Finally, the paper offers an analysis of the first-ever DPA concluded in the U.K. highlighting the most controversial legal issues arising from such an agreement. This can be considered a landmark decision not only because the SFO's first application for a DPA was approved by the judiciary, but also because it was the first time in which a legal entity was charged in England and Wales with the offence of "failure of commercial organisations to prevent bribery" as provided by section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010.

Keywords: Deferred Prosecution Agreement; DPA; corporate criminal liability; identification principle; identification doctrine; bribery; corruption; inheritance of corporate liability; deterrence in corporate punishment; anonymity; international ne bis in idem; Standard Bank; ICBC; Serious Fraud Office

JEL Classification: K1, K2, G3, K14, K42, K22, G34

Suggested Citation

Grasso, Costantino, Peaks and Troughs of the U.K. Deferred Prosecution Agreement: The Lesson Learned from the First-Ever DPA between the SFO and ICBC SB PLC (March 16, 2016). Journal of Business Law, Sweet and Maxwell (Forthcoming); Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 223/2016 . Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2748688 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2748688

Costantino Grasso (Contact Author)

University of East London - School of Business and Law ( email )

University Square Stratford
1 Salway Road
London, Greater London E15 1NF
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 20 8223 3085 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
299
rank
95,954
Abstract Views
911
PlumX Metrics