Deficient Statutory Notices and the Burdens of Proof: A Reply to Mr. Newton

8 Pages Posted: 10 Sep 2004

See all articles by Leandra Lederman

Leandra Lederman

Indiana University Maurer School of Law

Abstract

This article replies to an article written by Anthony Newton. (Tax Notes, May 14, 2001, p. 1139.) Mr. Newton argued that Shea v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 183 (1999), will help alleviate the burden on taxpayers from uninformative notices of deficiency. This reply contends that although Shea may have reached a correct result in shifting the burden of proof to the IRS, it did so by muddying an important area of the law. In fact, by conflating two procedural rules to reach its decision, the Tax Court may have eliminated the possibility of sanction for some uninformative notices.

Suggested Citation

Lederman, Leandra, Deficient Statutory Notices and the Burdens of Proof: A Reply to Mr. Newton. Tax Notes, Vol. 91, No. 16, July 2, 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=275492

Leandra Lederman (Contact Author)

Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )

211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
(812) 855-6149 (Phone)
(812) 855-0555 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.indiana.edu/people/lederman

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
Abstract Views
2,174
rank
290,894
PlumX Metrics