Beyond the 'More Economics-Based Approach': A Legal Perspective on Article 102 TFEU Case Law

29 Pages Posted: 5 May 2016

See all articles by Pablo Ibáñez Colomo

Pablo Ibáñez Colomo

London School of Economics - Law Department

Date Written: March 20, 2016

Abstract

The interpretation of Article 102 TFEU by the EU courts has given rise to considerable controversy in the past decade. However, it is not always well understood. The purpose of this contribution is to uncover the rationale underpinning the case law on exclusionary practices and to provide a legal perspective on ongoing debates. An analysis of the case law reveals that some practices are deemed prima facie abusive while others are only subject to Article 102 TFEU insofar as they are likely to have an anticompetitive effect. This difference mirrors the object/effect dichotomy that is observed in the context of Article 101 TFEU. The criteria used to draw the line between abuses ‘by object’ and ‘by effect’ is also the same. Against this background, it appears that the ‘frictions’ observed in the case law can be understood and addressed following the principles sketched by the ECJ in Cartes Bancaires.

Suggested Citation

Ibáñez Colomo, Pablo, Beyond the 'More Economics-Based Approach': A Legal Perspective on Article 102 TFEU Case Law (March 20, 2016). Forthcoming in (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review; LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 09/2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2755656 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2755656

Pablo Ibáñez Colomo (Contact Author)

London School of Economics - Law Department ( email )

Houghton Street
London WC2A 2AE, WC2A 2AE
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
753
rank
31,536
Abstract Views
1,887
PlumX Metrics