Dealing with Heteroskedasticity, Autocorrelation and Endogeneity in German Audit Fee Panel Data - Comparing Approaches

34 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2016

See all articles by Balthasar Hoehn

Balthasar Hoehn

University of Wuerzburg

Florian Schuberth

University of Twente

Manuel Steiner

University of Würzburg - Business Administration & Economics

Date Written: November 25, 2014

Abstract

In this paper we provide an extensive comparison between commonly used linear econometric methods in the audit fee literature and explicitly address their underlying assumptions. As opposed to common practice in similar papers we explicitly consider violations of the strict exogeneity assumption in terms of unobserved firm-specific effects and argue that endogeneity is likely to be present in audit fee data sets. This leads to significantly different results for magnitude and significance level of most explanatory variables. Additionally, we encourage researchers to use the in the audit fee literature not so widely-spread Hausman-Taylor estimator to benefit from its efficiency.

Keywords: audit fees, panel data, endogeneity, Hausman-Taylor estimator

JEL Classification: M40, M42, C21, C23, C26

Suggested Citation

Hoehn, Balthasar and Schuberth, Florian and Steiner, Manuel, Dealing with Heteroskedasticity, Autocorrelation and Endogeneity in German Audit Fee Panel Data - Comparing Approaches (November 25, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2756338 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2756338

Balthasar Hoehn

University of Wuerzburg ( email )

Sanderring 2
Würzburg, D-97070
Germany

Florian Schuberth (Contact Author)

University of Twente ( email )

Postbus 217
Twente
Netherlands

Manuel Steiner

University of Würzburg - Business Administration & Economics ( email )

Sanderring 2
Wuerzburg, D-97070
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
377
Abstract Views
2,379
Rank
137,240
PlumX Metrics