Targeted Killing at a Distance: Robotics and Self-Defense

19 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2016

See all articles by Wayne McCormack

Wayne McCormack

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Date Written: March 31, 2012

Abstract

The Obama Administration started out to subdue some of the rhetoric of war from the prior administration, but in fact has upped the ante by multiplying the number of targeted killings that are directed against suspected militants. There is a difference between general military targeting and targeting of individuals, but the use of robotic weapons in both situations presents the same concern: will humanity eventually take itself so far out of the line of fire that it removes any natural limits on the use of force? From a potentially bewildering array of objections and justifications, two primary questions can be isolated: does the targeting of individuals who are away from a traditional battlefield violate general norms of self-defense, and does the use of robotic weapons violate international law? Both questions can be answered in the negative, but still leave troubling implications for the future.

Keywords: drones, law of war, robotics

JEL Classification: K33, K42

Suggested Citation

McCormack, Wayne, Targeted Killing at a Distance: Robotics and Self-Defense (March 31, 2012). Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, Vol. 25, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2757424

Wayne McCormack (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
39
Abstract Views
341
PlumX Metrics