The Choice between Rights Offerings and Private Equity Placements
42 Pages Posted: 6 Jul 2001
Date Written: November 2004
Abstract
We develop and test a nested logit model to examine how firms choose between a rights offering and a private equity placement. We find that family-controlled firms avoid issue methods that dilute control benefits or subject them to more monitoring, in particular when the family's control margin is small and the wedge between votes and capital is large. Control considerations also affect security design in equity issues. We also find that firms use private placements to reduce contracting and ex post holdup costs in new product market relationships. Finally, we find that firms with higher asymmetric information about firm value are more likely to involve underwriter certification in a rights offering, and to choose a private placement when information asymmetries are extreme.
Keywords: Seasoned equity offerings, Equity issue methods, Rights offerings, Private placements
JEL Classification: G32, G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Adverse Selection and the Rights Offer Paradox
By B. Espen Eckbo and Ronald W. Masulis
-
By Jun-koo Kang and René M. Stulz
-
Seasoned Equity Offerings: A Survey
By B. Espen Eckbo and Ronald W. Masulis
-
By Myron S. Scholes and Mark A. Wolfson
-
An Empirical Analysis of Incremental Capital Structure Decisions Under Managerial Entrenchment
By Abe De Jong and Chris Veld
-
Equity Financing in a Myers-Majluf Framework with Private Benefits of Control
By Xueping Wu and Zheng Wang
-
Equity Financing in a Myers-Majluf Framework with Private Benefits of Control
By Xueping Wu and Zheng Wang
-
Seasoned Equity Issues in a Closely Held Market: Evidence from France
-
Do Firms Time Equity Offerings? Evidence from the 1930s and 1940s
By Timothy R. Burch, Vikram K. Nanda, ...